Everyone
in the class – the 10th grade English class wherein
everyone had been assigned the seemingly impossible task of each
giving a speech that would elicit an emotion from someone in the
audience – every single person went for the joke, they went for the
laugh. Except for one.
It
seemed kind of obvious when it was over. What other emotion could one
really go for? And I have thought about it ever since. Why the laugh?
Often
a person new to the personal storytelling audience will ask, “how
is this different from stand-up comedy?” And it is a legitimate
question because the person who had just been on stage telling
probably had the audience laughing through the entire story. My
answer to that question is that stand-up comedy is usually a series
of rat-a-tat-tat one-liners, topical jokes of the day, whereas
personal storytelling often builds up to a very funny outcome with
amusing side-comments along the way. And the story connects us all –
sometimes it is funny merely because we identify so strongly with
what is going on.
And
being funny is a tool in other speeches also. Politicians and
preachers more and more often incorporate a joke into their talks –
if you think someone is going to make you laugh, you pay more
attention. Once a preacher or politician has your attention, you are
more likely to listen to what else he or she has to say. The joke is
a hook.
And often times corporate speeches have stories built in to
them, “let me tell you about Joe who worked for 20 years and never
wore a safety helmet....” because then the speaker has your
attention, you care about Joe, you sit up and listen because you want
to know what happened to Joe. After the speech, you might remember
Joe's story and with that memory, you might even remember the rest of
what the speaker had to say and take those words to heart. I am
fairly sure there are whole books of these stories for corporate
speakers to tap into – they are that valuable to the talks and in
making the orators sound good.
So
everyone in the class except for one person went for the laughs in
the elicit-an-emotion-from-the-audience assignment. We weren't such a
tough crowd as I had earlier predicted - we laughed when each speaker
hoped we would, and everyone got an A.
And
before I tell you all about that one person who did not go for the
laugh, I will explain what Miss Caffarelli had in mind when she gave
us the assignment – what her experiment was all about.
She
said that when we arrived in class on that very first day of the
school year, she discovered quickly that we were terrible writers! Miss Caffarelli then had an idea. If we were required to speak
what we had written, we would be more likely to put our words
together better; we would have tenses that matched; we'd have a
beginning, a middle, and an end and not ramble like we do in essays.
She said that we would care about what we wrote if we had to present
our words orally to an audience – we wouldn't want to be
embarrassed by our poor English.
So
the big experiment was for us to give speeches to the class and the
oral exercise would improve our writing. The whole
elicit-an-emotion from the audience part of the assignment was, I
guess, just an add-on. Oh my gosh – to have one's gut wrenched for
the sake of a piece of writing that made 10th grade sense!
And
the experiment was a success. Kind of. Miss Caffarelli was thrilled
with the outcome after everyone had given a speech. She said the talks
were well spoken and well written.
Could
we keep the momentum going?
Miss
Caffarelli asked us to do it all again! New speeches that would
reflect good writing. Round two did not have to elicit emotions – I
don't recall if there was a topic or not. I just remember that we
apparently did not care as much the second time around. Some students
were unprepared when they got up to talk; I have no recollection of
what I had to say that time.
And
there was no round 3. Apparently our writing was not going to improve
with the forced speeches after all.
But
golly, how this whole exercise has clung to me!
245
20150902 I Am Joe's Funny Bone
No comments:
Post a Comment