The second
philosophy class elective that I took in college was Logic, and that was my final semester senior year. Now you might
think I was already a logical person – I majored in the sciences, adhered to
the scientific method, believed in cause and effect, argued with classmates
over beers until dawn the case of determinism over free will – so being logical
should have been a given. But I guess what one really must conclude is that
sometimes logic is situational.
Logic was a fun class. There were Venn
diagrams – and Venn diagrams have math as well as logic applications. I learned that
information is given, but conclusions might not necessarily be made
from what is given. Another biology
major, John T sat next to me – and it was fun getting to know him and enjoy
logic class together.
The teacher,
however, Dr. Joly, had difficulties understanding my logic. On more than one occasion after going over an exam with the class,
he would stop and say, “Once again, Ms Des Soye, I am not following the answer
you gave to this question – could you explain it?” And then I explained and he
would usually give me credit –my logic was all right, it was just coming from a
different premise than the premise
everyone else had started from.
Isn’t that
something? Instead of just marking my answer wrong and taking off points for
not thinking like everyone else, Dr. Joly asked where I was coming from, and it
turned out to be legitimate – and I got the points!
Sure could use a little more
of that in this world!
Now, this was
not some lofty, out of the box kind
of thinking on my part during these logic exams. It was usually something much
more mundane – like the fact that I did not read the newspaper.
There is one
example that I have remembered all these years – mainly because when it came to
light, I was embarrassed by my total ignorance of current events.
Dr. J – Ms Des
Soye, why did you answer the way you did on this particular question?
D -
Well it is asking us to conclude that Senator Buckley will vote no on the latest abortion issue, and
that is not something we can assume.
Dr. J – Do you
know who Senator Buckley is?
D -
Yes, he is our Senator from New York State.
Dr. J - And
do you not know Senator Buckley’s stand on abortion?
D - I know he is William Buckley’s brother,
James, and William is a conservative, and being a conservative, William is probably against abortion,
but it would be wrong to assume his brother is also a conservative and against
abortion.
Dr. J – Do you
read the newspaper?
D -
No.
Dr. J – Senator
Buckley is quite well known for his stand against abortion.
D - Oh
At the point
where I was asked if I read the newspaper, my head was hanging quite low – I deserved
every bit of humiliation I was feeling.
The exam
question was a good one for those who equated Senator Buckley with
anti-abortion – but not a good logic question for the dunces of the world who
did not read the Buffalo Evening News!
I’m a little
bit better about keeping up with current events these days, but logic, ah
logic, that often escapes me still!
322 20151118 Fate Effect Logic
No comments:
Post a Comment