Miss Armstrong was my
English teacher in seventh grade. This is the class I remember the
most after all these years, but I can't say I particularly liked it
at the time – it was not my favorite; I do not know which seventh grade class was my favorite – I was a teenager, everything was a
drag.
In English class, our desks were usually in a circle or
horseshoe – so we could see each other during discussions. There
were kids who talked animatedly when participating,I can still see them, and there were
those kids who did not talk at all - like me.
Outside, in the real
world those days, there were the Viet Nam War protesters, the Civil Rights
marchers, and Equal Rights demonstrations. Sometimes the crowds would
not disperse. Sometimes they got rowdy to the point of violence or
riots. They were also embarrassing to the leaders in Washington.
Arrests were often made. Good behavior or bad – the groups were in
the newspaper headlines and on the television news daily.
Miss Armstrong decided to
bring current events into the classroom. The First Amendment says
Americans have the right to peaceful assembly. The demonstrations in
our cities were legal, but could the anger and the protests possibly
be construed as treason? Could their size, their potential for violence, or outright protests be a violation of the rights of others who would
rather the protesters just go home and stop complaining? The teacher
proposed a debate – one side, comprised of four students in the
class, would be in favor of the right to demonstrate, and the other
side, also comprised of four students, would propose that the right
to demonstrate should be done away with.
Well, I signed up for the
pro side. We had already won, I figured, because we had right on our
side. The civil right to gather was already well-established in the
amendments to our Constitution! There was no need to prepare an
argument or examples to illustrate our point. All we needed to say
was – it is a law, so we are right! I guess this goes back to what
I perceived home to be like – no discussion, just one parent
or the other declaring what is right, and that was all there was to
it.
Of course, the other
side, the four students arguing that demonstrations should not be
legal, presented their case with facts, case histories, eloquence,
and by comparison to our side, with persuasion. All our side said
was, “it's a law, so it's right”. Miss Armstrong seemed a bit
surprised – she tactfully explained to us that one should always be
prepared to defend one's point of view with something more than a
fist coming down on the table. And then she said the other side had
won the debate!
Right did not win.
How unusual is that?
131 20150511 God on Our
Side
No comments:
Post a Comment